Atlanta, GA – During the ongoing investigations of Hillary
Clinton, being done by everyone from congress to the FBI, and about everything
in her past from emails to her actions during Benghazi, Mrs. Clinton has taken
to calling the investigations a “witch hunt.” She says it derogatorily, like
those involved should blush and be ashamed of themselves. But she’s actually
right, these investigations are witch hunts.
And she’s the witch.
In the midst of all the scandals surrounding Mrs. Clinton, it
still seems at this point that she is unlikely to de indicted or prosecuted on
any charge, and of course, one is innocent until proven guilty, even if one is
a Clinton. However, there is a high court which no mortal can overrule; that of
public opinion.
All the lack of evidence in the world cannot destroy the fact
that to those on the outside looking in, Mrs. Clinton’s entire operation looks
tainted. Her hidden connections with Blumenthal, her apparent disregard for
rules in the handling of classified information, her equivocating and
misleading statements to the public about her emails, her receipt of money from
foreign governments, many of whom were and remain massive human rights violators.
All of this looks to ordinary idiots like it just might be a bit shady.
But while Mrs. Clinton may have some technical jargon to help
her get out of every predicament she has ever placed herself in, her final
argument at the end generally becomes “well I was never convicted!” That’s
true, but Al Capone was also never convicted of the Valentine’s Day Massacre,
and anyone on the street would say “I saw the movie, he did it.”
The truth is that Mrs. Clinton has been a public figure who
has a hard time staying away from the appearance of wrong doing, someone who
looked to be playing with cards under the table, so to speak, for more than two
decades.
Stretching back to Watergate, there has been a history of
such things, such as when records that were important to the case went missing,
and then suddenly turned up, in one of Mrs. Clinton’s aide’s offices. Mrs.
Clinton claimed that the room was cluttered, (which was true) and the papers
simply had been missed. (Some, including a Secret Service Agent claimed they
were stolen from Foster’s office on the night of his suicide.)
Maybe what Mrs. Clinton said was true, but there was also the
apparent hush money some friends of the Clintons, the billionaire Indonesian
Riady family, played to another player in the 1990s, Clinton scandals. The
Clintons claimed their relationship with the Riadys was purely social, even
though there is a four-page, single-spaced letter from the patriarch of that
family, Mochtar Riady, to President Bill Clinton, urging upon him certain
actions on foreign policy. Maybe the fact that the Riadys may have paid hush
money to someone who could have damaged the Clintons, and was then urging the
president to normalize relations with Vietnam was coincidence, but it sounds
much more like graft, nepotism, and corruption than innocence.
After each allegation is made, Mrs. Clinton generally comes
up with a quite innocent sounding response, and maybe she is telling the truth
each time. But when it happens again and again, it becomes harder and harder
for the average person to believe her.
Hundreds of years ago, if little children got sick, if the
crops were bad, or if lightning struck the church and burned it to the ground,
the locals assumed that there was, somewhere in the dark woods, cackling over a
pot full of bat ears and snake heads, a witch who was petting a black cat and
holding an oversized broom. Maybe they were right. I doubt it, but you never
know.
The important thing was that the woman was seen muttering strange things on the night of the storm. She
was probably just senile, but it looked
bad. And that was all the public needed. Did all of them really believe she was
a witch? Of course not. Maybe some just didn’t like her. But she was projecting
an image, and as everyone knows, perception is more important than reality.
These days, when documents that could do damage to someone go
missing, and then suddenly appear right in their very house, when hush money
appears to be paid, when an entire email server is wiped, when an American
ambassador dies and no one, including the Secretary of State, helps him, and
when money is received from foreign governments by the very person who is
supposed to deal with those foreign governments in the interest of the United
States, we might be led to assume that somewhere at the back of all this is
someone who, if not quite a criminal, does not go to sleep at night with a
conscience as clean as Mother Teresa’s.
Mrs. Clinton didn’t kill Vince Foster; she doesn’t ride a
broom, although if you listen enough to Republican talk radio you might start to
think she does. There was probably nothing she could have done to save the
Americans at Benghazi, but she sure could have handled the situation better. And
the fact that she keeps getting caught muttering things on the night of the
storm looks bad.
She’s no witch, but she’s no genius at handling the public
perceptions and the media, either. If anything she is so bad at it that it
might show she is more inept than corrupt. But in the end, a politician lives
or dies in the court of public opinion, and that court can still sentence
people public burning at the stake. Mrs. Clinton will never face jail time for
any of the things she has done. But even if she is, as she probably will be,
exonerated on every charge in every scandal, it probably won’t be enough. Children
will still hurry past her door for fear of being turned into toads and donors
and voters will turn to other, less frightening options, if they can find them, or they might just do nothing at all this cycle.
And that will be the story of the witch from Arkansas; a
woman who might well have been innocent, but just didn’t know how to make it
look that way.
Andrew C. Abbott
No comments:
Post a Comment