·
Divisibility,
·
Portability,
·
Durability,
·
Recognizability,
·
Scarcity (after Sproul, 2012.)
If we were on a barter system and I have sheep and want to
buy a cow and my friend wanted to sell his cows, but he did not want sheep, we
could not trade. However, if I have four hundred dollars, I could buy a cow,
and he could use that money, which stores its relative market value, to go and
buy wheat, which is what he really wants.
However, the money must be relatively scarce, or it will lose
purchasing power. Again, if I have a lot of couches, and I want to sell them,
but I have thousands of them, and there is only a limited supply of money, then
I will have to lower prices if I want to catch some of that limited supply.
However, this also works the other way as well, if I print
the units of money, and I print thousands and thousands of them, (or trillions
and trillions) but the other economic units, the couches, the cars, and the
houses remain relatively stable, then I will have to give more of these money units
to catch some of those other units.
Our understanding and use of money, as individuals and whole
societies, have a profound effect on the quality of our stewardship. A faulty
money system can cause people to misjudge the value of their money and, hence,
their ability to afford and services…. In short, a faulty monetary system can
cause us to waste resources—resources over which God has made us stewards and
for the use of which He will hold us accountable.
—E. Calvin Beisner, Prosperity and Poverty
Through His Strength We Will
Conquer,
Andrew C. Abbott
No comments:
Post a Comment